The planning layer for hybrid human/AI organizations.

We build a living model of how your work gets done today, then help you redesign it across humans, vendors, software, and AI agents — before you commit.

Workflow
Function
Tier-1 customer inquiries
Customer Ops

Recommended scenario: Deploy agent on intake + triage. Keep humans on escalations and edge cases. Projected 42% lower cost-to-serve and 73% faster cycle time, with medium quality risk pending escalation rules.

Today: 68 FTE · $14.20/ticket · AI suitability 78%

Underwriting review
Risk Ops
Quote-to-cash exceptions
Revenue Ops
Compliance attestation
Legal

Don’t just deploy agents. Plan the operating model around them.

Org charts are static. Consultants are manual. Workflow tools only show fragments. Planisphere gives leaders a living model they can plan and simulate against.

01

Living operating model

A current-state map of workflows, roles, systems, and handoffs.

02

Scenario simulation

Compare cost, quality, speed, and risk across human, vendor, software, and agent mixes.

03

Transformation roadmap

A defendable plan you can execute against and re-run as reality changes.

What we model about your operations

The dimensions we capture, observe, and co-author with your team:

Workflows

Steps, handoffs, exceptions, cycle times

Roles & capacity

Who does what, skills, utilization, FTE cost

Systems

Tools that touch each step; data + decision points

Volume & variability

Throughput, peaks, seasonality, failure modes

Cost-to-serve

Fully-loaded cost per workflow and per outcome

AI suitability

Per-task replaceability, augmentability, and risk

Outputs

Operating model + transformation plan

Simulate before you commit

Pick a lever — deploy an agent, offshore a queue, consolidate teams, absorb volume growth — and see the impact across cost, cycle time, quality, and risk.

Recommended scenario

Deploy agent on Tier-1 inquiries; humans retain escalations

Headcount

68 → 41

Cost / yr

$7.4M → $4.1M

Cycle time

18h → 4h

Risk

Medium

Why this scenario

Quality: ↑ consistency on routine intake; ↓ on edge cases — route those to humans.

Accountability: Humans own escalations + final rejections; agent owns intake + triage.

Dependencies: Escalation rules + audit trail required before rollout.

Alternative scenarios

Augment humans with an agent (no headcount change)

Lower risk, smaller cost reduction.

Cost / yr

$7.4M → $6.1M

Cycle time

18h → 9h

Risk

Low

Considerations

Agent drafts responses; humans approve before send.

Preserves edge-case quality and existing accountability lines.

Captures ~15% cost reduction without renegotiating vendor contracts.

Offshore Tier-1 instead of deploying an agent

Comparable cost, slower cycle, vendor risk.

Cost / yr

$7.4M → $4.6M

Cycle time

18h → 14h

Risk

Medium

Considerations

BPO partner absorbs intake and triage on a per-ticket rate.

Quality variance higher than agent-led triage; SLAs harder to enforce.

Adds vendor concentration risk; harder to unwind than an agent rollout.

This is not agent orchestration.

Most agent companies hand you an agent. We hand you the map of where agents go, what they break, what they save, and how the org should change around them.

Agent orchestration

  • Infra / runtime category
  • “Here is an agent that does X”
  • Optimizes a single workflow
  • Built for engineers

Planisphere

  • Management / system-design category
  • “Here is the map of where agents go”
  • Optimizes the whole operating model
  • Built for the COO, CTO, Head of Ops

Plan the work, then deploy the agents.

If you’re being asked what AI does to your operating model — start with the map.

Book a Diagnostic
planisphere

The planning layer for hybrid human/AI organizations.

Book a Call